<strike id="wg64m"><center id="wg64m"></center></strike>
  • <abbr id="wg64m"><abbr id="wg64m"></abbr></abbr><small id="wg64m"></small>
    苍井空亚洲精品AA片在线播放,欧美丝袜另类,国产传媒av,91福利区,国产xxxxxx,久草视频网站,亚洲欧美天堂,WWW.99热
    Hotline:400-880-1556

    English




    Notice! IECEE International Electrotechnical Commission issued a number of interim resolutions on battery CTL

    Author:中認(rèn)聯(lián)科 time:2021-09-29 Ctr:1870

    On September 14, 2021, the IECEE International Electrotechnical Commission announced the latest CTL agreement on batteries. The three battery CTL interim resolutions released this time are as follows:

    01 CTL Interim Resolution

    PDSH 2182: Charging cut-off current

    PDSH 2182.png

    Question: According to IEC 62133-2:2017 clause 7.1.2, the second charging procedure prepared for the test project requires a charging cut-off current of 0.05 It A. When the battery manufacturer defines different charging cut-off currents, which cut-off battery should be used to set the charging conditions?

    Answer: 0.05It A should continue to be used.

    However, according to the manufacturer's requirements, a set of separate tests can be performed on samples prepared using the manufacturer's defined cut-off current for reference. When charging with the cut-off current specified by the manufacturer, the upper limit voltage of the battery must not be exceeded.

    explain:

    The charge cut-off current has a great probability of affecting the charging state of the sample and the compliance of the test. Therefore, the value 0.05ItA defined in the standard should be strictly followed. On the other hand, considering that the charge cut-off current designed by the battery manufacturer for its products may be different to reflect the expected use conditions, it is allowed to set separately except for 0.05 ItA. The test of the charge cut-off current is for reference only. According to section 7.1.2, the upper limit voltage of the battery must not be exceeded, regardless of the charge cut-off current value.

    02 CTL Interim Resolution

    PDSH 2161: Sample

    PDSH 2161.png

    Question: According to IEC 62133:2012, IEC 62133-1:2017, IEC 62133-2:2017 Clause 6, when evaluating batteries (packs), does the battery cell manufacturing time in the samples require no more than six months?

    Answer: Not required.

    explain:

    IEC SC21A WG4 confirmed that it plans to delete the sample requirement six months ago in the next edition of IEC 62133-2.

    Related topics:

    Q1: If the battery cell has not been tested separately, it will be sent together with the battery (pack) for evaluation and CB certification. In this case, can the battery manufacturing time be exempted?

    A: In this case, a separate full set of tests are required for the batteries, which is suitable for the requirement that the manufacturing time of the batteries cannot exceed six months.

    Q2: What needs to be paid attention to when applying for CB certification for battery (package) manufacturers in cross-border supply chains?

    A: The cycle of designing and producing batteries (packs) using cross-border purchased batteries may be longer. When the batteries (packs) are made, the battery manufacturing time may have exceeded six months. It is recommended that the cell manufacturer complete the CB certification in advance and provide cell samples and CB certificates. When the battery (pack) manufacturer subsequently performs the battery (pack) CB certification, it does not need to consider the issue of the cell manufacturing time exceeding six months.

    Q3: The battery (pack) that has obtained the CB certificate and report needs to be forwarded to other mark certification based on the CB certificate and report. Is the (temporary) decision also accepted?

    A: Based on the existing CB certificate and report transfer, it is based on the acceptance of the IEC standard and its CTL (temporary) resolution. However, it is not ruled out that the issuing agencies of different countries or regions have differentiated practices or requirements to issue their own marks.

    Q4: Regarding the content of this interim resolution, will you consider directly revising the standard in the future?

    A: The IEC SC21A working group WG4 plans to cancel the six-month sample requirement in the next edition of the 1.1 edition of IEC 62133-2.

    03 CTL Interim Resolution

    PDSH 1037A: Selection of series battery samples

    PDSH 1037A.png

    Sampling principles for battery series testing:

    This interim resolution expanded the battery standards applicable to the original resolution (No. DSH 1037) to include IEC 62133:2002, IEC 62133:2012, IEC 62133-1:2017, IEC 62133-2:2017, IEC 62619:2017 and IEC 62660 -3:2016. In order to facilitate a better understanding, some text adjustments have been made to the content of this resolution.

    Question: If a series of batteries of the same size, chemical system, voltage, and capacity are produced by the same manufacturer, if the safety compliance of the entire series is to be verified, which model should be selected for testing?

    Answer: In the above example, when the total capacity difference exceeds 20%, start from the highest capacity and calculate the capacity value with an amount lower than 20% of this value. Select those models in the series whose capacity is closest to the calculated value for testing. If the total capacity difference of a series of batteries does not exceed 20%, select the lowest, highest and closest model in the middle of the series for testing. Changes that may cause any test failure shall be considered as new models and shall be subjected to the required tests.

    explain:

    The type of change that may be considered different from the test type, which may cause any test results to fail, which may include but is not limited to:

    (a) The material of the positive electrode, negative electrode, separator or electrolyte has changed;

    (b) Changes in protection devices, including hardware and software;

    (c) Changes in the safety design of battery cells or battery packs, such as exhaust valves;

    (d) Changes in the number of cells that make up; and

    (e) The change of the connection mode of the battery cell assembly.

    Related topics:

    Q1: In response to the requirements of different OEMs, manufacturers need to design soft-packed and square-shaped hard-shell batteries, and their electrical parameters are exactly the same. Can they be tested and certified as a single model or series?

    A: Considering that the physical structure of the soft case and the square hard case battery is quite different, and the difference directly affects the related test results and judgments, it needs to be considered as two independent battery projects.

    Q2: When there are differences in specific aspects, the battery cannot be tested and certified as a single model or series?

    A: The original resolution (No. DSH 1037) standardizes the specific sampling principles. At the same time, it standardizes the main factors that affect the series judgment. If there are the following differences, they are generally not treated as series:

    (1) Difference in size

    (2) Differences in chemical substances

    (3) Difference in voltage

    (4) Differences in materials of positive electrode, negative electrode, separator or electrolyte

    (5) Differences in protection devices, including hardware and software

    (6) Safety design differences of batteries or batteries, such as bleed valves

    (7) Cells in series and parallel connection and their number differences, or

    (8) Differences in battery cell connection methods.

    Based on the strictness of the above specifications and the dangerousness of the battery, during actual testing and certification, the battery is basically a single model.

    Related terms:

    IECEE  International Electrotechnical Commission Conformity Assessment Scheme System

    NCB  National Certification Body

    IEC SC21A  IEC Battery Technical Committee

    WG4  IEC Battery Technical Committee Portable Battery Working Group

    CTL  Testing Laboratory Committee

    ETF13  Battery Expert Working Group

    DSH  resolution

    PDSH  Interim Resolution

    Reminder

    Under certain specific circumstances, the IEC standard needs to make necessary elaboration, specification or further clarification, and form a CTL (temporary) resolution when necessary. It is recommended that you fully understand and implement the battery IEC standard and CTL (temporary) resolution based on the above discussion.

    ZRLK has focused on battery product testing and certification for 15 years, always paying attention to changes in national laws and regulations, and providing customers with one-stop testing and certification services to ensure that your products quickly enter the target market. If you have batteries and battery-containing consumer smart products that need to be tested and certified, please feel free to contact us, our engineers will serve you as soon as possible!

    Related Articles
    • The EU Data Act will be mandatory in 2025! Compliance guidelines for EU-based companies are here

    • Urgent notice! Before December 31, 2025, the old SRRC certificate must complete the standard upgrade!

    • Heavy! FCC certification is about to be fully restored! Enterprise response guide collection quickly!

    • Bluetooth Headset PSE Certification Guide: Essential for Market Access in Japan, Clear Explanation of Process Materials in One Go

    Follow Us
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 五月天成人小说| 97se亚洲国产综合自在线观看| 一本一道av无码中文字幕﹣百度| 恭城| 亚洲色图第一页| 日韩欧美亚洲国产精品字幕久久久| 日本亚洲成a人片在线观看| www.日韩欧美| 国产少妇偷窥自拍| 国产人久久人人人人爽| 日本亚洲一区二区| 日本人妻中文| 影音先锋丝袜制服| 国产亚洲av手机在线观看| 人妻制服丝袜中文字幕| 国产99视频免费精品是看6 | 亚洲成a人网站在线看| 超碰福利导航| 国产成人青青久久大片| 久久99亚洲网美利坚合众国| 无码天堂va亚洲va在线va| 人人妻人人狠人人爽天天综合网 | 99中文在线精品 | 亚洲无码五区| 女人天堂AV| 国产精品SM捆绑调教视频| 亚洲国产精品久久艾草| 国产一区二区三区在线观看免费| 日韩av免费在线观看| 大陆一级毛片免费播放| 色欲人妻综合AAAAAAAA网| 成人福利视频| 91乱子伦国产乱子伦海的味道| 人妻精品综合?码| 久久亚洲国产成人精品性色| 欧美亚洲一区二区三区| 久久久亚洲欧洲日产国码αv| 一本色道久久综合无码人妻| 亚洲熟女VS国产对比| 欧美成a人片在线观看| 熟女Www亚洲国产W|